Arminius on sinful men being called to Christ

This just appeared in my email and I wanted to share it and see what you think.  Feel free to comment!

 

DISPUTATION XLII ON THE VOCATION OF SINFUL MEN TO
CHRIST, AND TO A PARTICIPATION OF SALVATION IN HIM

The calling to Christ and His
benefits, is the gracious act of God. This is through the word and His Spirit.
He calls forth sinful men who are subject to condemnation and under the dominion
of sin due to the condition of natural life, and out of the defilements and
corruptions of this world. They are called to obtain a supernatural life in
Christ through repentance and faith.  The goal being to become united with Him,
the life destined and ordained by God, and may enjoy the participation of His
benefits, to the glory of God and to their own salvation. The cause of this
calling is God and the Father in the Son. The Son because He is affirmed
Mediator and King by God the Father, calls men by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit of
God being given and the Spirit of Christ, the King and the Head of His church,
by whom the Father and the Son both “work hitherto.” However,  this calling is
so administered by the Spirit, that He also, is properly designated as the
author of it. For He appoints bishops in the church, He sends teachers, He
furnishes them with gifts, He grants them divine aid, and imparts force and
authority to the word.  The antecedent or only moving cause is the grace, mercy
and philanthropy of God, by which He is inclined to send relief for the misery
of sinful men, and to bestow blessedness upon him. Nevertheless the
primary cause is the wisdom and the justice of God, by which He knows the means
by which it is proper for this call to be sent forth. His will dispenses it in
its proper and right form. The decree of His will determines its administration
and mode.  The usual cause of the call is the word of God being administered by
the aid of man, either by preaching or by writing, and this is the usual mode;
or it is the divine word directly sent by God, inwardly to the mind and will,
without human aid or
endeavor.
However, this is an uncommon method. The word employed, in both these cases, is
that both of the law and of the gospel, subordinate to each other in their
separate services. Men are called in their sensual life, as worldly, natural,
sensual, and sinful. The conditions in which they are called are both the state
of natural life and that of sin and of misery on account of sin. Consequently
also, from the state of condemnation and guilt, and ultimately from the bondage
and dominion of sin. The situation in which they are called is the
proper illustration of grace, or of supernatural good, and of every spiritual
blessing, the fullness of which resides in Christ — also their power and force,
as well as the inclination to communicate them. The immediate goal of this
calling is, that men may love, fear, honour and worship God and Christ — may in
righteousness and true holiness, according to the command of the word of God,
render obedience to God who calls them, and may, by this means, make their
calling and election sure.  The ultimate end is the salvation of those who are
called, and the glory of God and of Christ who calls; both of which are
fulfilled in the union of God and man. For as God unites Himself to man, and
declares Himself to be prepared to unite Himself to him, He makes His own glory
illustrious; and, as man is united to God, he obtains salvation.  This call is
both external and internal. The external call is by the ministry of men
propounding the word. The internal call is through the operation of the Holy
Spirit illuminating and affecting the heart, that attention may be paid to those
things which are spoken, and that credence may be given to the word. From the
unity of both these arises the effectiveness of the call. But these actions must
not be thought of as unrelated parts joining but may be understood as parts
which comprise the whole; that is, the concept of the whole act of being called
containing separate activities uniting together to one result, namely, obedience
yielded to the calling. Likewise the company of those who are called and who
answer to the call are also a unified whole called “a Church.” The refusal of
the call, the rejection of the doctrine of grace, contempt of the divine
counsel, and resistance manifested against the Holy Spirit, can be properly
ascribed to the wickedness and hardness of the human heart. This state
frequently invites the just judgment of God which avenges the contempt shown to
His word. Furthermore, from this rejection follows blindness of mind, a further
hardening of the heart, and a progressive delivering up to a reprobate mind, and
to the power of Satan.

—Complete Works of Arminius     (This shows Arminius taught the call and
response of sinful men was contingent upon God’s grace wholly and yet deserving
and requiring a corresponding action on the part of the called one. Nevertheless
this response depending on and through indispensable grace and mercy
from God Himself. This therefore denies men glory
and God the
blame.)

 

Limited Atonement

I’ve been terribly sick for the past four days or so.  Even today I’m still running fever with difficulties breathing.  I haven’t slept very well in the past few days either.  Hopefully tomorrow I can experience a tremendous improvement.  So back to Calvinism…………………I was just about ready to become an ardent Calvinist until I came across this video.  Wow!  I’m glad  watched it.  Enjoy.

 

 

 

Christians and Cigars

Hey!  Spurgeon enjoyed cigars didn’t he?  Shouldn’t it be mandatory that all Christians enjoy a stinky, smokable turd in the evening and share it with his or her delightful daughter?  Sound weird?  Well it is.  You see, I know of at least two backslidden Christians that maintain their love for Christ (sort of) yet they are smoking Cigars now.  Now this is disturbing because just a few months ago they would have been adamantly opposed to such a practice.  Yet now they are happy approving of many things that suddenly are not bad after-all while Cigars smoking is one of them.  I have decided to include an article/study on cigar smoking for your educated consideration before you decide to jump on the cigar smoking wagon.  Enjoy!

De Libero Arbitrio

I have been reading through a small book containing Luther’s and Erasmus’ thoughts on free will.  I have enjoyed the read very much so far and I thought that it would be only appropriate to share with you, my fellow bloggers and blog readers alike.  The book is entitled, “Milestones Of Thought, in the History of Ideas with translation work provided by Ernst F. Winter.  The following is from Erasmus,

This malice of Pharaoh God has utilized for his honor and for the salvation of his people; thus revealing even better that it is vain of man to oppose the will of God.  In the same manner a clever king or a “pater familias” will use the hardness of men, however odious it may be to him, in order to punish villains.  Nevertheless, the free will is not violated when the outcome of an event is in God’s hands, and when God according to his hidden decision guides men differently from what they have resolved.  Just as he guides the intentions of the villains to benefit the pious, so the intentions of the latter miss their goal if God’s grace does not assist them.  This is what Paul means when he says:  “So then there is question not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God showing mercy” (Romans 9,16).  Gods’s mercy precedes our will, accompanies it, and gives it fruitfulness.  Nevertheless it remains that we wish, run and attain, except that all this we must ascribe to God, to whom we belong with everything we are.”

So wouldn’t you agree in light of this that Erasmus departs from traditional Calvinist pre-determinism?  If not, maybe I should share more on the specifics on Erasmus’ thoughts on foreknowledge.  Consider the following,

“The knotty point how God’s foreknowledge is compatible with our free will has often been amplified.  But in my opinion Lorenzo Valla has been most successful at it: Foreknowledge does not cause what is to take place.  Even we know many things which will be happening.  They will not happen because we know them, but vice versa.  An eclipse of the sun does not occur because astronomers predict it, but it can be predicted, precisely because it will take place.”

Does this seem to skate upon the fragile lake of Open theism?  I don’t know but I do know that I seem to get more and more confused as I look into this wonderful subject.  Hopefully clarity will come in the form of Biblical understanding on such a complex subject.

Calvin On Predestination And Foreknowledge

Many people don’t really realize what John Calvin said about the predestination and foreknowledge of God.  So to be fair I thought I would share with you a portion of the Institutes.

……………………….. ” When we attribute foreknowledge to God, we mean that all things always were, and perpetually remain, under his eyes, so that to his knowledge there is nothing future or past, but all things are present.  And they are present in such a way that he not only conceives them through ideas, as we have before us those things which our minds remember, but he truly looks upon them and discerns them as things placed before him.  And this foreknowledge is extended throughout the universe to every creature.  We call predestination God’s eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to become of each man.  For all are not created in equal condition; rather, eternal life is foreordained for some, eternal damnation for others.  Therefore, as any man has been created to one or the other of these ends, we speak of him as predestined to life or to death. ……………….” ( Calvin’s Institutes Abridged edition p.113, 3.21.5,Donald K. McKim, editor )

A couple of things that I notice is that I believe more could be said about Calvin’s foreknowledge when one takes into consideration his understanding of predestination.  Specifically the statement, “we call God’s eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to become of each man.”  Now I do understand the context of this statement is the foreordaining some to eternal torment and others to everlasting life, but I wonder if Calvin stopped here?  Viz. Is the volition of man therefore evaporated my God’s eternal decree in light of “ what he willed to become of each man”?  Does this mean that all things that are, are necessarily pre-determined by God?  This would include every rape, murder, acts of incest, and any other vile thing.  Are these things therefore not only foreknown by God but actually planned? (if you will).

Next, I find it interesting that when I meet Calvinist and dis-agree with their definition of ‘total depravity’ they immediately remind me that all men were deserving of death and were under the judgement of God and that all men were in the same boat, so to speak.  However, by the grace of God some were saved from the pool of hell deserving men.  Yet I notice in this section the statement, “For not all are created in equal condition”….  This means without doubt that the men, women and even infants that end up in the Calvinist hell are there not specifically because of their volition to sin but because it pleased God to create them for the sole purpose of eternal damnation and torment.  If all of this is true, and I’m seeing this correctly, then I can only conclude that the Calvinist view of God paints a picture of the biggest monster in the universe!  Consider the following verses;

“For I have no pleasure in the death of one who dies,” says the Lord GOD.  “Therefore turn and live!” (Ezekiel 18:32)

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” (John 3;16)

 

Tuesday Miscellaneous

I have been working in Marianna this week and will be in Tallahassee Thursday and Friday.  The fellow that I’m working for is a 5 point Calvinist!  You hardly ever meet a REAL Calvinist in this area.  We had a good discussion which consisted mainly of the normal Arminian hits the Calvinist sword and vice versa.  It started out on the perseverance of the saints but quickly ended up on total depravity.  It turns out that my new 5 pointer friend has recommended me meeting one of his buddies that is well-studied and well versed on the subject.  I’m looking forward to learning more about their position.  I might even dust off Calvin’s institutes and give them another scan.  Of course I will only do so if it has been pre-ordained that I do so as well with the fact that I will remain an Arminian unless of course God has determined that I won’t!

See ya!

Conditional Security Of The Believer

Perhaps more mis-understood and mis-represented than Calvinism is the theological belief and the Biblical teaching that a Believer is Secure in Christ based on a condition.  What is the condition?  Is it get saved, sin, then lose your salvation everyday?  Certainly not!  This truly would be a miserable condition wouldn’t it?  Some claim that the focus turns from Christ to yourself in examining every last detail of your performance thus making you fall into the trap of some sort of works salvation.  Does this sound like the ‘good news’ to you?  Not me!  I should go ahead and tell you that I too am a Conditional Security Believer and I affirm that I am saved by grace through faith alone.  I have become a recipient of God’s grace through my faith in the work of Christ alone and I remain in God’s grace through this same faith alone.  It is Christ plus nothing.  With this said please consider a definition of Conditional Security,

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
 
 
James Arminius

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Conditional preservation of the saints, or commonly conditional security, is the Arminian belief that believers are kept safe by God in their saving relationship with Him upon the condition of a persevering faith in Christ.[1] Arminians find the Scriptures describing both the initial act of faith in Christ, “whereby the relationship is effected, and the persevering faith in Him whereby the relationship is sustained.”[2] The relationship of “the believer to Christ is never a static relationship existing as the irrevocable consequence of a past decision, act, or experience.”[3] Rather, it is a living union “proceeding upon a living faith in a living Savior.”[4] This living union is captured in this simple command by Christ, “Remain in me, and I in you” (John 15:4).[5]

According to Arminians, biblical saving faith expresses itself in love and obedience to God (Galatians 5:6; Hebrews 5:8-9).[6] In the Arminian Confession of 1621, the Remonstrants (or Arminian leaders) affirmed that true or living faith operates through love,[7] and that God chooses to give salvation and eternal life through His Son, “and to finally glorify all those and only those truly believing in his name, or obeying his gospel, and persevering in faith and obedience until death . . . .”[8]

Arminians believe that “It is abundantly evident from the Scriptures that the believer is secure.”[9] Furthermore, believers have assurance in knowing there is no external power or circumstance that can separate them from the love of God they enjoy in union with Christ.[10] Nevertheless, Arminians see numerous warnings in Scripture directed to genuine believers about the possibility of falling away in unbelief and thereby becoming severed from their saving union with God through Christ.[11] Arminians hold that if a believer becomes an unbeliever (commits apostasy), they necessarily cease to partake of the promises of salvation and eternal life made to believers who continue in faith and remain united to Christ.[12] Therefore, Arminians recognize the importance of warning believers about the danger of apostasy and exhorting them to persevere in faith as a means of building them up in their faith and encouraging them to mature spiritually, which is a sure and biblical way to avoid apostasy.[13]

So do you agree with that definition and the following explanations?  If not, why not?  I would like to conclude with the following statement that addresses the caricature of the Arminian that is said to lose his salvation over and over again throughout his long miserable existence.

Marshall concludes: “The New Testament contains too many warnings about the danger of sin and apostasy for us to be complacent about these possibilities…. These dangers are real and not ‘hypothetical.’”[65] Methodist scholar Ben Witherington would add: “The New Testament suggests that one is not eternally secure until one is securely in eternity. Short of that, there is the possibility of apostasy or rebellion against God by one who has believed in Christ. Apostasy, however, is not to be confused with the notion of accidentally or unconsciously “falling away.” Apostasy is a conscious, wilful rebellion against God . . . . Unless one commits such an act of apostasy or rebellion, one need not worry about one’s salvation, for God has a firm grip on the believer.”[66]

There you have it!  Arminians are secure in Jesus despite the fact that we believe that one can commit apostasy.  For more information  go here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_preservation_of_the_saints

Friday snag

Well, what I thought would be a highly profitable week as far as money goes actually turned out to be just above average!  I hate it when that happens.  If you are a business owner you may know what I mean.  The problem turns out to be that my bid on one particular job was just over cost.  How did this happen?  It seems that my accounts payable generated from this job is much higher than should have been both in labor and materials.  It only took just two small changes in the job to generate a problem of knocking me out of my groove.  Last but not least I’ve been cooking the books so to speak as I have been juggling accounts payable with payroll.  I know, I know, you should never do this but sometimes I have to and this week was my chance to attempt to balance the books out and step away from our consistent and nagging shortfall. 

I was supposed to go drag racing tonight but my great-aunt died Wednesday morning and her viewing was tonight with the funeral following Saturday morning at 10:00.  She lived to be 84 years old and I started thinking that if I live that long then I really don’t have much longer to live!  Wow, we are just a vapor.  With this in mind it causes me even the more to focus on finishing the race.  I’m not a Calvinist nor am I OSAS so I continue to take all the CONDITIONAL  security verses in mind.  One being,

“But he who endures to the end shall be saved.”  Matthew 24;13

If eternal security is true we should expect the verse to read as follows,

“He who is saved WILL endure to the end.”  Genesis 3;4

I only ask you, which position best represents Matthew 24;13?  Conditional or unconditional security?

Ephesians 2;8-10

Okay, to answer yesterdays trivia read below;

John Calvin on Ephesians 2:8-9 “…he does not mean faith is the gift of God,
but that salvation is given to us by God, or, that we obtain it by the gift of
God.” Calvin’s Commentaries, Volume 11, page 145.
A.T. Robertson: “‘Grace’ is God’s part, ‘faith’ is our’s…..the act of being
saved by grace conditioned on faith on our part.” Word Pictures, 4:525
   This is information taken from page 189 in Chosen But Free, N. Geisler, 2001

There you go, Calvin himself didn’t view faith as the gift.  What do you think?